Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jackson v. Wray et al
as 3:2023cv02363
Plaintiff:
NaKisha Jackson
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Apple Inc, Unknown Federal Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wray et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
NaKisha Jackson
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Apple Inc, Unknown Federal Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeil v. Central Nissan et al
as 4:2022cv01916
Plaintiff:
Patricia McNeil
Defendant:
Central Nissan, General Manager Chad Milow and Unknown Federal Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bustillos v. El Paso County Hospital District et al
as 3:2015cv00311
Defendant:
Daniel Solomin, Shaked Laks, Frank Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Bustillos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donegan v. Unknown Federal Agents and Assets
as 2:2017mc00480
Petitioner:
Edward Paul Donegan
Respondent:
Unknown Federal Agents and Assets
Williams v. Unknown Federal Agents et al
as 1:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Federal Agents and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Unknown Federal Agents et al
as 1:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Federal Agents and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Unknown Federal Agents et al
as 1:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Federal Agents and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Unknown Federal Agents et al
as 1:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Federal Agents and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Unknown Federal Agents et al
as 1:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Federal Agents and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
