Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Soto #222563 v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jesus M Soto
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Unknown Alvarez and Unknown Ivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nali #449422 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00191
Plaintiff:
Frank Nali #449422
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Unknown Ivens, C. Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson #184722 v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2009cv01064
Plaintiff:
Richard James Simpson #184722
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Patricia Caruso, George Pramstaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Contor v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 08-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD J. CONTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, Individually and in her capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections and UNKNOWN IVENS, Doctor employed by Correctional Medical Services, Inc. individually
Snell #262331 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00254
Plaintiff:
Leroy Snell #262331
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Unknown Pandya, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nali #449422 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv00255
Plaintiff:
Frank Nali #449422
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Jan Trombley, Unknown Buzcek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mracna #243117 v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01071
Plaintiff:
George William Mracna #243117
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Aloysius A. Aquino, Helen Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contor #236210 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2007cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Contor #236210
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso and Unknown Ivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
