Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathial Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathial Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Rheems et al
as 3:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant:
Luke Rheems, Unknown Nettle, Unknown Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Nettles et al
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Nettles and Unknown Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv00462
Plaintiff:
Jarvis J. Brown
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Darryl Vannoy, Unknown Calihan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Ducey et al
as 4:2020cv00287
Defendant:
David Neal, Unknown Pacheco, Nataylie Weizel and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. LaCombe et al
as 3:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Unknown Nettles, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Darrel Vannoy and others
Plaintiff:
Freddy Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2018cv01040
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy, John Bel Edwards, Antonio Wittaker and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrich v. Dusek et al
as 4:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Devin Andrich
Defendant:
Kevin Dusek, Unknown Jones, Unknown Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
