Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Roy v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jessica Roy
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Villano
as 13-4797
Defendant:
Kevin Samperi, Lt, I/O, Venditto, Ofcr, Hamden Police Dept, Hamden Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Vorcelia Tanya Oliphant, Esq.
Appellee:
Joyner, Detective, I/O, Unnamed Defendants, I/O, New Haven Police Dept, Peterson, Lt, I/O and others
Thompson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2013cv03980
Plaintiff:
Bradford John Thompson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Villano
as 13-2917
Defendant:
Kevin Samperi, Lt, I/O, Venditto, Ofcr, Hamden Police Dept, Hamden Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Vorcelia Tanya Oliphant, Esq.
Appellee:
Joyner, Detective, I/O, Unnamed Defendants, I/O, New Haven Police Dept, Peterson, Lt, I/O and others
ELEUTERI v. ROJAS et al
as 3:2013cv04326
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE A. ELEUTERI
Defendant:
NEIL ROJAS, GARY GORE and UNNAMED DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keith Judd v. Unnamed Defendant
as 13-11709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNNAMED DEFENDANTS
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kamal Roy v. Unnamed Defendant
as 12-15379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL K ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNNAMED DEFENDANTS
Doe v. The Pennsylvania State University et al
as 4:2012cv02068
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania State University, The Second Mile, Edgewater Psychiatric Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Oliphant v. Villano
as 12-3825
Defendant:
Kevin Samperi, Lt, I/O, Venditto, Ofcr, Hamden Police Dept, Levy, Ofcr, I/O and others
Appellee:
Thomas Wydra, Chief, I/O, M. Sigmon, Sgt, I/O, Town of Hamden and others
Appellant:
Vorcelia Oliphant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
