Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Rodriguez-Soto et al v. Rego et al
as 1:2024cv10284
Plaintiff:
Noralba Rodriguez-Soto and Urbano Patino
Defendant:
Aiden Rego, Katherine Burger, Timsi Rao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Urbano v. Seabreeze Fish Market Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
David Urbano
Defendant:
Seabreeze Fish Market Inc., Vincent J. Dimino and Paul Dimino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Urbano v. Timberlake
as 24-652
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN URBANO
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE
YUEN v. MUNICIPALIDAD METROPOLITANA DE LIMA et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
JOSE SAM YUEN
Respondent:
MUNICIPALIDAD METROPOLITANA DE LIMA, AUTORIDAD DE TRANSPORTE URBANO PARA LIMA Y CALLAO and REPUBLIC OF PERU
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
SHAW v. ZEE et al
as 1:2023cv21068
Plaintiff:
ALLISON M. SHAW
Defendant:
TROOPER DOUGLAS ZEE, TROOPER BERNARD TENNANT, TROOPER KENNETH LANGEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Leon Gomez v. Garland
as 21-1061
Petitioner:
URBANO DE LEON GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendez Amador, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1970
Petitioner:
URBANO MENDEZ AMADOR and KEVIN MENDEZ RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
TUBAGANE v 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08139
Plaintiff:
GODFREY SSEMUKUUTU, ALLAN SSEMWANGA, BADRU SSEMWOGERERE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
