Cases 1 - 10 of 412
BLUE v. ELKINS et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL ELKINS, MIAIAH J. POTWYN, MARK D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRASWELL v. COLLINS-DENNIS et al
as 1:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
ANDRE V. BRASWELL
Defendant:
ALICIA COLLINS-DENNIS, DEBORAH OATS LIGHTFOOT and TANNIKA LIGHTFOOT PATTON
HUNTER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
GRACE V. HUNTER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MONTGOMERY v. KING et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
KENDALL MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
LYNETTE KING, V. OSBURN, HEFLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. LINCOLN et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
V. LINCOLN, YARBER, IVY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THE VLADIMIR GUSINSKY REVOCABLE TRUST v. CUMMINS, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust and THE VLADIMIR GUSINSKY REVOCABLE TRUST
Defendant:
CUMMINS, INC., Norman Linebarger, Jennifer Rumsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Rozner v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Maria Edlyn V. Rozner
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Downey v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Samuel V. Downey
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
