Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cisneros v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
Michael V Cisneros
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cisneros v. Gomez et al
as 5:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
Michael V Cisneros
Defendant:
Sheriffs Deputy Gomez and Oklahoma County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60564
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert Gamez, Jr. v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-16741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CARRASCO GAMEZ, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections, LANCE R. HETMER, GREG FIZER, Deputy Warden at ASPC Florence Central Unit and others
Gamez #131401 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01757
Plaintiff:
Robert Carrasco Gamez, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Lance R Hetmer, Greg Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Roberto Cisneros-Valdez
as 12-10130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO CISNEROS-VALDEZ, AKA Roberto V. Cisneros, AKA Alberto Cisneros-Mesa, AKA Roberto Valdez-Cisneros
USA v. Roberto Cisneros-Valdez
as 12-10131
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO CISNEROS-VALDEZ, AKA Roberto V. Cisneros, AKA Alberto Cisneros-Mesa, AKA Roberto Valdez-Cisneros
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv21108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
