Cases 1 - 7 of 7
De La Cruz Masin-Martinez v. Garland
as 21-6378
Petitioner:
ROBERTO ANTONIO CHAPETON-PEREZ, CESAR ANTONIO CHAPETON-MASIN, JUANA DE LA CRUZ MASIN-MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Percy et al v. U & I Mechanical Corporation
as NYE/1:21-CV-02283
Defendant:
U & I Mechanical Corporation, Vamco Sheet Metal, Umbanet Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Percy, Albert E Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non- profit, as Class Representative,
Godinez et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2020cv00828
Plaintiff:
Yosila Godinez, N. V. E. and Oscar Velasquez Esteban
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GODINEZ et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv01833
Plaintiff:
OSCAR VELASQUEZ, YOSILA GODINEZ, OSCAR VELASQUEZ ESTEBAN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Courtney Adams, et al v. Blount County, et al
as 19-5306
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KIM HUSKEY, Mother of Decendent and Personal Representative on behalf of Estate of Anthony Edwards and COURTNEY ADAMS, Mother and Next Friend of Minor K. E. and Minor V. E.
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPUTY JERRY BURNS, In his Individual and Official Capacity
Defendant:
BLOUNT COUNTY
YOUNGER v. CARTENGENA et al
as 2:2008cv00824
Plaintiff:
JASHAWN YOUNGER
Defendant:
R. CARTENGENA, K. MILLER, F. DEJESUS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
V. E. et al v. Lancaster Elementary School District
as 2:2007cv07574
Plaintiff:
V. E., V. E., Sandra E. and others
Defendant:
Lancaster Elementary School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
