Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Woods v. Cook et al
as 5:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Leki Woods
Defendant:
Pamela F Cook, J Byers, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Holt v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 12-3556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Houston Holt, also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, D W Tate, Captain, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Gregory Holt v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 12-3185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Houston Holt, also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, D W Tate, Captain, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
REID et al v. THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION et al
as 4:2012cv01352
Plaintiff:
G. N. C.Q. , Z.M. D.L. C.I. , A.A. J.D. D.P. and others
Defendant:
THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION , D.R. Acquisition Corp. , Marvin K. Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Pitts v. William Warren, et al
as 12-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Benton Pitts
Defendant - Appellee:
William Albert Warren, Dr., Cummins Unit, V. R. Robertson, Major, Cummins Unit, Mark Warner, Deputy Assistant Warden, Cummins Unit and others
Pitts v. Warren et al
as 5:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
William Albert Warren, V R Robertson, Mark Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sr. Kate Reid, et al v. Doe Run Resources Corp., et al
as 12-1079
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sr. Kate Reid, Megan Heeney, as next friends of, Y. V. R. V., By next friend Kate Reid, By next friend Megan Heeney and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Doe Run Resources Corporation, D. R. Acquisition Corp., Marvin K. Kaiser and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
