Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pale Horse Realty, LLC v. Bezio, et al
as 24-1449
Plaintiff:
PALE HORSE REALTY, LLC
Defendant:
CHRISTINA A. BEZIO and DOUGLAS G. BEZIO
Interested Party:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, VALERIANO DIVIACCHI, HUTTLECORP. INC., d/b/a Re/Max Classic and others
Valeriano Diviacchi v. State Bar of California
as 23-16170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALERIANO DIVIACCHI
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Diviacchi v. State Bar of California
as 3:2023cv02417
Plaintiff:
Valeriano Diviacchi
Defendant:
State Bar of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Diviacchi
as 23-1234
Respondent:
VALERIANO DIVIACCHI
Interested Party:
ROBERT M. FARRELL and ROBERT M. FARRELL, Clerk of Court
Pale Horse Realty LLC v. Bezio et al
as 1:2022cv11710
Plaintiff:
Pale Horse Realty LLC
Defendant:
Christine A. Bezio, Douglas G. Bezio, U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Pale Horse Realty, LLC v. Bezio et al
as 1:2022cv11705
Plaintiff:
Pale Horse Realty, LLC
Defendant:
Christine A. Bezio, Douglas G. Bezio, U.S. Bank National Association, not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. DIVIACCHI
as 2:2017mc00031
Petitioner:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Respondent:
VALERIANO DIVIACCHI
In Re: Diviacchi
as 16-8004
Respondent:
VALERIANO DIVIACCHI
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2016mc91020
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Valeriano Diviacchi
Sovereign Bank v. Diviacchi
as 13-1476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOVEREIGN BANK
Defendant:
CAMILLA J. WARRENDER
Interested Party - Appellant:
VALERIANO DIVIACCHI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
