Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Castro v. CoreCivic Inc.
as 3:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Mark Castro
Defendant:
CoreCivic Inc., CoreCivic, Inc., Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Settle v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Billy Hoyle, Ashleigh Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hodge v. Van Dyke et al
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Maxwell M. Hodge, III
Defendant:
Ashleigh Van Dyke, A. W. Norman, f/n/u Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thigpen v. Davies et al
as 3:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Thigpen
Defendant:
Robert E. Lee Davies, William Acree, Don Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2018cv01397
Defendant:
Michael Van Dyke, Tony Crawford, Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Ezra Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Dozier et al
as 3:2017cv01331
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Kelly
Defendant:
Steve R. Dozier, J. Wesley King, Elain Ann Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv01097
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
TN Dept of Corrections, Investigations and Compliance et al Unit, Jonathon Flake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
Stanley Van Dyke
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Dyke v. Biomedical Tissue Services, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv02249
Plaintiff:
Penny L. Van Dyke and Penny L. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Biomedical Tissue Services, LTD., Michael Mastromarino, Joseph Nicelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
