Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ROGO et al v. TYSON et al
as 5:2015cv01446
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. ROGO and TWILIGHT B. ROGO
Defendant:
MARK D. TYSON , DORIS G. GONZALES , OLD MARPLE ANIMAL HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tony M. Graham v. VCA Antech, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08614
Plaintiff:
Tony M. Graham and Pamela G Moe
Defendant:
VCA Animal Hospitals Inc, VCA Antech Inc and VCA Inc.
Tristan v. VCA Antech, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00340
Plaintiff:
Tim Tristan
Defendant:
VCA Antech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. VCA Antech, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02158
Plaintiff:
Tony M. Graham
Defendant:
VCA Antech, Inc. and VCA Animal Hospitals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Memphis Veterinary Specialists, LLC f/k/a Medvet Memphis, LLC v. VCA Antech, Inc. d/b/a Antech Diagnostics et al
as 2:2011cv02924
Plaintiff:
Memphis Veterinary Specialists, LLC f/k/a Medvet Memphis, LLC
Defendant:
VCA Antech, Inc. d/b/a Antech Diagnostics and Antech Diagnostics
Miscellaneou:
John C. Robertson
Counter_claimant:
Antech Diagnostics and VCA Antech, Inc. d/b/a Antech Diagnostics
Counter_defendant:
Memphis Veterinary Specialists, LLC f/k/a Medvet Memphis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv02815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Andrea Ladrido v. VCA Antech Inc et al
as 8:2010cv00336
Defendant:
DOES, Pets RX Inc, VCA Animal Hospitals Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Ladrido
Martin M. Smith v. VCA Animal Hospitals et al
as 2:2010cv10500
Plaintiff:
Martin M Smith
Defendant:
VCA Animal Hospitals and VCA Antech, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
