Cases filed in Rhode Island
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bispo v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families et al
as 1:2019cv00106
Defendant: Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, Judge Haiganush Bedrosian, Hasbro Childrens Hospital and others
Plaintiff: Vera Lucia Alves Bispo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paiva v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00208
Plaintiff: David Paiva
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Sergio Desousarosa, Rui Diniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Chafee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00586
Plaintiff: Parrish Chase
Defendant: Lincoln Chafee, David Fathi, Alvin J. Bronstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEFLOW v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2009cv02711
Plaintiff: VERA ELLEN SEFLOW
Defendant: DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Anderson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02349
Plaintiff: Charles Robert Anderson, Albert E. Barnes, Michael Cardamone and others
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clay v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02302
Plaintiff: Vera Clay
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Vera v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01962
Plaintiff: Ana Maria Vera
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2007md01842
Plaintiff: Deborah June Bilbrey, Wendy H. Risley, Lois Askins and others
Defendant: Davol, Inc, WCO Medical Products Corporation, Baolien Nguyen Tu and others
Interested Party: Ernest Cory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?