Cases 1 - 10 of 668
Thomas et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Walter Thomas and Desmond Bailey
Defendant:
Victor Hill and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterkin v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01945
Plaintiff:
Raheem Peterkin
Defendant:
Victor Hill and CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spangler v. Echevarria et al
as 1:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Walter Spangler
Defendant:
Victor Perez Echevarria, Santiago Brothers, Inc. and Progressive Express Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lendard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wonda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hightower v. Hill
as 1:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
Kentrevious J. Hightower
Defendant:
Victor Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Freeman v. The Great American Dream, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Mary Freeman
Defendant:
The Great American Dream, Inc. doing business as Pin Ups, SlickVic's LLC doing business as Slick Vic Entertainment, Ashley Fowler and others
Hamilton v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Roland Boehrer, Terrance Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Covey v. Victor et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Troy Covey
Defendant:
Courtney Buntin Victor doing business as Glow MedSpa, Catherine Kerley and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Obeginski v. Walker
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBEGINSKI v. WALKER
as 5:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
WARDEN VICTOR WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
