Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rodriguez-Alvarado v. Garland
as 24-483
Petitioner:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-ALVARADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Victor Rodriguez v. USA
as 21-71369
Petitioner:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez Lazo v. Garland
as 21-587
Petitioner:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ LAZO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv10364
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv99665
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. TNJ ENTERPRISES INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04824
Plaintiff:
LUINY GOMEZ , EDICKSON GARCIA , JULIAN VASQUEZ and others
Defendant:
TNJ ENTERPRISES INC. , FRANK LAZAUSKUS and JOHN DOES # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez v. USA
as 5:2016cv02659
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Victor Rodriguez v. Samuel Salus, et al
as 15-2142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, on his own Behalf
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL SALUS, Judge, Court of Common Pleas for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, Norristown, PA, JOSEPH P. MASCARO, District Attorney for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, MARY FITIPALDI, District Attorney for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, Norristown, PA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01939
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RODRIGUEZ v. SALUS et al
as 2:2014cv06637
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
SAMUEL SALUS, JOSEPH P. MASCARO, MARY FITIPALDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
