Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Clark v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03396
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Christopher Lee Bishop, Sylvia Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. D. Reynolds, et al
as 21-11403
Defendant / Appellee:
AMELIA G. PRAY, Assistant District Attorney, Cobb County, D. VICTOR REYNOLDS, former District Attorney, JOYETTE M. HOLMES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Victor Reynolds, et al
as 21-10614
Defendant / Appellee:
AMELIA G. PRAY, CHRISTINA WILLOUGHBY, VICTOR REYNOLDS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Joyette Holmes, et al
as 20-13601
Defendant / Appellee:
AMELIA G. PRAY, Assistant District Attorney, Cobb County District Attorney's Office, MICHAEL W. ALMAND, Court Reporter, CHRISTINA WILLOUGHBY, Admin. Specialist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Daker v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2020cv02650
Defendant:
District Attorney Joyette Holmes, Amelia G. Pray, D. Victor Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. COLE et al
as 7:2020cv00100
Defendant:
PAUL HOWARD, GWEN KING, DANNY PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Holmes et al
as 1:2020cv01232
Defendant:
Diane M. Stark, Amelia G. Pray, Kathleen Sherwood and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Daker et al
as 1:2019cv01636
Defendant:
A.A. Butch Ayers, Jordan Cyphers, Charles M. Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Velez v. D. Reynolds, et al
as 18-12604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO VELEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
D. VICTOR REYNOLDS and MARTY FIRST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
