Cases 1 - 10 of 31
VINES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02343
Plaintiff:
RONALD DEWITT VINES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO BARKER HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISSAAC FULWOOD, PATRICIA VINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CICCOTELLI v. VINE ENERGY INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04533
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
VINE ENERGY INC., ERIC MARSH, ANGELO ACCONCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
VINES v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv01792
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, SEAN MARLER, ALEXIS WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. VINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vining v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2019cv20187
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff:
Elaine Vining
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VINE v. TRI-WIRE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
DAVID VINE
Defendant:
TRI-WIRE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MUNSON v. THE 7-ELEVEN DELI BROAD & RACE VINE CHAIN et al
as 2:2015cv03058
Plaintiff:
PAUL MUNSON
Defendant:
THE 7-ELEVEN DELI BROAD & RACE VINE CHAIN, THE A-PLUS DELI MARKET, 7-ELEVEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS-VINING v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2013cv00309
Plaintiff:
CARLA DAVIS-VINING
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE - FOREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
