Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SCHMITZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02317
Plaintiff: MARK SCHMITZ, SUZANNE SCHMITZ, DIANE FOLEY and others
Defendant: ERICSSON INC. and TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
ADAMS v. HEAD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02670
Plaintiff: DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant: CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DE LA CRUZ et al v. ALEXANDER et al
as 1:2020cv01842
Defendant: ERIC A. ALEXANDER and CHRISTOPHER A. ALEXANDER
Plaintiff: ANA DE VALDEZ, LUCIA DE LA CRUZ, BRENDA VALDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant: TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, JENNIFER THARP and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01821
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VALDEZ-ALVARO v. USA
as 1:2017cv00368
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ALVARO RAMON VALDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PEREZ v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff: IVAN VALDEZ PEREZ
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VALDEZ v. USA
as 1:2015cv00194
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ANTONIO VALDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ADAMS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2014cv00433
Plaintiff: DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant: NELDA MARTINEZ, CARLOS VALDEZ, FLOYD SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE et al v. ROLL et al
as 1:2007cv02039
Plaintiff: EDWARD CRAIG POOLE, ROSARIO ANDRADE DEL SOL, AVELINO VALDEZ VASQUEZ and others
Defendant: JOHN M. ROLL, DAVID C. BURY, FRANK R. ZAPATA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?