Cases 41 - 50 of 221
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 1:2021cv00705
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Brazier, Kelita Moore, Donald J. Valenza and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Officer Isler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00707
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Donald J. Valenza, Spencer Downs, Kelita Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Valenza (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00685
Plaintiff:
Marquis Rashad Thompson
Defendant:
Donald J. Valenza and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00599
Plaintiff:
Marquis Rashad Thompson
Defendant:
Donald J. Valenza, Officer White and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Valenza et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2021cv00398
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Donald J. Valenza, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Isbell v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00368
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, James Brazier and Jason Smoak
Plaintiff:
David Scott Isbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
Alkeem J. Britt
Defendant:
James Brazier, Teresa Coles, Caleb Creech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Alkeem J. Britt
Defendant:
Bill Rafferty, James Brazier, Thomas Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millette v. Valenza (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Dominic Anthony Millette
Defendant:
Houston County Sheriffs Department and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00141
Defendant:
Bobby Hill, Lt. Jones, Donald J. Valenza and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Thomas Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
