Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Buth v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Van Buth
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ha et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Loc Van Ha and Dung Tran
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCarty v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi et al
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Michael McCarty
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi, Aaron Smith, Andrew England and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herberger v. Nelson et al
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Herberger
Defendant:
Tyrone Nelson, Arnold Van and John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague v. Arnold
as 1:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dale Teague, Jr.
Defendant:
Van Arnold
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. AL-Van, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Justin Williams
Defendant:
AL-Van, LLC and John Doe Concrete Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Van
as 4:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Defendant:
Madeline Van
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tran et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 1:2021cv00369
Plaintiff:
The Van Tran and Chin Thi Nguyen
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., Ltd., Knauf International GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ha et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Loc Van Ha and Dung Tran
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
