Cases 1 - 10 of 12
VANHORN v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2020cv00376
Defendant:
VIGO CO. JAIL, JOHN PLASSE and SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
LONNIE E. VANHONN and LONNIE E. VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanhorn v. Robinson III et al
as 1:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Richard Vanhorn
Defendant:
Charles Robinson III , Con-way Freight, Inc. and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Savage v. VanHorn
as 4:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Brandon Savage
Defendant:
Andrew D VanHorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANHORN v. STECKLER et al
as 2:2015cv00137
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
J. R. SMITH and JOHN STECKLER
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAVAGE v. VANHORN
as 1:2015cv00759
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SAVAGE
Defendant:
ANDREW D. VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VANHORN et al v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2014cv00275
Defendant:
ALL MAILROOM EMPLOYEES, HARLEY CRABB, TROY KEITH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL CHIVERS and WILLIAM VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANHORN v. VANHORN
as 4:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ANN VANHORN
Defendant:
LINDA ELAINE VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
CHADWICK et al v. PROPST et al
as 1:2012cv01605
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN T. CHADWICK
Defendant:
DIXON, KING, OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANHORN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2012cv00284
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOSEPH VANHORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHADWICK v. MARION COUNTY JAIL II (CCA) et al
as 1:2012cv01174
Defendant:
BOES, WARDEN CONWAY, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN T. CHADWICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
