Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Bradley v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Vance Bradley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Vance v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 3:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Vance
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Sheriff v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Sheriff
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Chief of Police James E. Davis, Officer Miron B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Bonner et al
as 3:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
Michael R. Bonner, Travis Vance, Richard Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheriff v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Sheriff
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Jackson Police Department, Chief of Police James E. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Boone et al
as 3:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Magistrate Steven Boone, State of Mississippi, Phil Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Vance v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dawn Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hoard v. Vance
as 3:2021cv00363
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dorez Hoard
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Lee D. Vance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramsey v. Tutor
as 3:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Sandra M Ramsey
Defendant:
Dr. Vance Tutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Hinds County Circuit Court
as 3:2021cv00203
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Hinds County Circuit Court and Sheriff Lee D. Vance
Plaintiff:
Marcus Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
