Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Vantell
as 1:2023cv01257
Petitioner:
Jamie Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Vance Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone et al v. Vantell et al
as 3:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Ja'Don Malone and Jason Young
Defendant:
Vance Vantell and CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobbs v. Vance et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah Hobbs
Defendant:
Carl Vance and Kings Eagle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Vance v. USA
as 1:2023cv00091
Petitioner:
Jon Charles Vance
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Massey v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kayla Massey
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Dameon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacks v. Big Cedar LLC
as 2:2022cv02824
Plaintiff:
Officer Vance Stacks
Defendant:
Big Cedar LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Williams et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Brenda Williams, Christa Cook, Christopher Derick Montgomery and others
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vance et al v. Washington County Jail
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Roger Vance, James Swann and James Vines
Defendant:
Washington County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maze v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Vance Maze
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
