Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gaona v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2011cv08007
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gaona
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Roger Vanderpool, Page, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutenkauf v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02129
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Gutenkauf
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Hugh Hallman, Unknown Hallman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Estrada v. Montgomery et al
as 4:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
Andres Efren Estrada
Defendant:
Kathleen Montgomery, Department of Public Safety and Roger Vanderpool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levingston v. Piburn et al
as 3:2009cv08138
Plaintiff:
Lynnell Levingston
Defendant:
Patricia Piburn, Victoria Earle, Steve West and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wright et al v. State of Arizona et al
as 4:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Paportia R Wright and Bodyguard Security, Inc., d/b/a Bodyguard Security
Defendant:
State of Arizona, Roger Vanderpool, Arizona Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bohnert v. Mitchell, et al
as 2:2008cv02303
Plaintiff:
Curtis Bohnert
Defendant:
J. Mitchell, George A Burke, Kevin Carr and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henry v. Miranda et al
as 4:2008cv00121
Defendant:
Richard Miranda, Tony Sabori, State of Arizona and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stewart v. Jacobs et al
as 2:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Zakkiyah Stewart
Defendant:
G. R. Jacobs, E. Paulson, B. Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv01692
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Paul D Clement, A Gonzales and others
Defendant:
G W Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
