Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Vargas v. Crestline Hotels and Resorts
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael Vargas
Defendant:
Crestline Hotels and Resorts doing business as Hampton Inn and Suites
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Vargas v. Janow et al
as 3:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
Angel Williams Vargas and Angel William Vargas
Defendant:
Joseph Janow, Coty Holland, (f/n/u) Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Kohl's, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Kohl's, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosa E. Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Buckner v. Vargas et al
as 3:2020cv00562
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Conrad, Davidson Co. Sheriffs Office, Trinity Food Service and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Buckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Acceptance Insurance Agency of Tennessee, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00611
Plaintiff:
Robert Vargas
Defendant:
Acceptance Insurance Agency of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adame et al v. Meridia EXP, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Proto Adame , Jose Hernandez , Nicolas Vargas-Castrejon and others
Defendant:
Meridia EXP, LLC, CSX Corporation , CSXT Transportation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Farrell et al v. Vargas et al
as 3:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Farrell and Richard E. Farrell
Defendant:
Jose E. Vargas and Flash Truck Lines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vargas v. Trauger et al
as 3:2013cv00600
Plaintiff:
Alva N. Vargas
Defendant:
Aleta A. Trauger, Juliet E. Griffin, (f/n/u) Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gifford v. Hall et al
as 3:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Gifford
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Daniel Weikal, Mark King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Hall et al
as 3:2010cv00598
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Riley
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Wade Hales, John Troup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
