Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Stueben v. Meade et al
as 5:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stueben
Defendant:
Desmond Meade, Contrina Vaughn, Steve Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Treece v. Truitt et al
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Catherine Truitt, Andrew Houlihan, Terry Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Treece v. Kinsley et al
as 5:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Kody Kinsley and Vaughn S. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Vaughan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
George E Vaughn and George E. Vaughan
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VAUGHN v. HERRING et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL DAVIS VAUGHN, JR
Defendant:
Jasmene Herring and Summit Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Grice v. USA
as 3:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Artemus Vaughn Grice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
VAUGHN, JR. v. ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
CARL DAVIS VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant:
ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. and BRADLEY J. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VAUGHN v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
CARL DAVIS VAUGHN, JR
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and BRIAN D. SAVOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
