Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Vent v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv09309
Plaintiff:
Sierra Vent
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Vent v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Sierra Vent
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Orobio v. USA
as 1:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Osiber Vente Orobio
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vent v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Sierra Vent
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Vent v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023oe00602
Plaintiff:
Sierra Vent
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Air Vent Inc v. Powermax Electric Co Ltd Guangdong
as 3:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Air Vent Inc
Defendant:
Powermax Electric Co Ltd Guangdong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gilleland v. Goldberger et al
as 2:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Gilleland
Defendant:
Leiby Goldberger, Curtis Swanson, Home Based Franchise Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Air Vent Inc v. Powermax Electric Co Ltd Guangdong
as 3:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Air Vent Inc
Defendant:
Powermax Electric Co Ltd Guangdong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
