Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton, Estate of George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 6:2021cv01850
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Installation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McKinney v. United States Department of Vetrans' Affairs et al
as 1:2016cv00569
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Elaine McKinney
Defendant:
United States Department of Vetrans' Affairs, Veterans' Benefits Administration, Verizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fair v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 14-2194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Avon E. Fair
Defendant - Appellee:
Verizon Communications Inc., Verizon Inc. and Verizon, et al
Roy v. AT&T
as 13-1212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Rev. Dr. K.K.K. Roy
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Verizon Inc., All B.O.E. and others
Roy v. AT&T et al
as 1:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
K.K.K. Roy
Defendant:
AT&T, Verizon Inc., All B.O.E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
