Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
In re: Delbert and Bonnie Crandall Family Trust, U A dated December 5, 1998
as 5:2024cv00500
Not Yet Classified: In re: Delbert and Bonnie Crandall Family Trust, U/A dated December 5, 1998 and Delbert and Bonnie Crandall Family Trust, U A dated December 5, 1998
Respondent: Verizon Savings Plan for Management Employees and Verizon Communications Inc.
Petitioner: Larry M. Crandall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Carlos Malacon v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01431
Plaintiff: Carlos Malacon, Caleb Beutler and Shawn Stroud
Defendant: Verizon Communications, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant: Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff: Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01744
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Core Optical Technologies, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00789
Plaintiff: Core Optical Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Does 1-10, AT and T, Inc., Microsoft Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Howard Schatz v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv09661
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10, Oath, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Howard Schatz
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
X-17, Inc. v. Yahoo, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03551
Defendant: Yahoo, Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: X-17, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant: OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff: George Kruse and Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
David Louis Whitehead v. Netflix Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05500
Defendant: MGM INC, JP Morgan, UNNAMED DEWAYNE WICKHAM and others
Plaintiff: David Louis Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?