Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MADDEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00665
Petitioner:
VERONICA MADDEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Cox v. Massachusetts Department of Correction, et.al.
as 1:2013cv10379
Plaintiff:
William Cox
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Harold W. Clarke, Luis S. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Glawson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2012cv11162
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Glawson
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, James Bender, Ronald Duval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv11013
Plaintiff:
Andrew A Davenport
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Luis Spencer, Veronica Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Fillis et al
as 4:2011cv40019
Plaintiff:
Celestino Colon
Defendant:
Charles Fillis, Thomas Ficco, Richard Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford et al v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv11202
Plaintiff:
Albert Ford, Joel Vasquez, Carlos Irizarry and others
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Veronica Madden, Paul Diapalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hager et al
as 1:2009cv12001
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams
Defendant:
D. J. Hager, Unknown "mental health watch officer", Massaschusetts Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baggett et al v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv40224
Plaintiff:
Michael Baggett
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy, Deval L. Patrick, Timothy P. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
