Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 188
Skudin v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff: David J. Skudin
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Tate Andale, LLC and Warren Pumps LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Kranz et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00588
Defendant: Cameron International Corporation, Elliott Company, FMC Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Kranz and Lucinda Kranz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Rushton v. AW Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00500
Defendant: Tate Andale LLC, Trane US Inc a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in the State of North Carolina formerly known as American Standard Inc doing business as American Standard Products Inc., ViacomCBS Inc and others
Plaintiff: Martha Rushton and Glen O Rushton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Hale et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv01112
Plaintiff: Dennis Hale and Lora Hale
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corp., Alfa Laval Inc., BW/IP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nikolaus J. Marcher et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff: Nikolaus J. Marcher and Lynne Marcher
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., 3M Company aka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AES Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grant Cochran et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv09612
Plaintiff: Grant Cochran, Charlene Cochran, Brent Cochran and others
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CRANE CO. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE COMPANY);, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benito C. Valdez, Jr. et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv08863
Plaintiff: Benito C. Valdez, Jr. and Georgia Valdez
Petitioner: Electrolux Home Products, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Copes-Vulcan, Inc.
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeSoto v. General Electric Company, Viacomcbs Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv06627
Plaintiff: Mark DeSoto
Defendant: General Electric Company, Viacomcbs Inc. (fka CBS Corporation, fka Viacom Inc., fka Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC (fka Foster Wheeler Corporation), Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis A. Rockwell et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03963
Defendant: ViacomCBS Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC, Warren Pumps, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Dawn Rockwell and Dennis A Rockwell
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Gary Stern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dominguez, et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv00927
Defendant: J&H Marine, Crane Co., Parker Hannifin Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Fernando Dominguez and Silvia Dominguez
Intervenor: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, TIG Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?