Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Odom v. Mason
as 3:2018cv00796
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Mason
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wooten v. Mason
as 3:2018cv00778
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Henry L. Wooten
Respondent:
Sheriff Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. Mason
as 3:2018cv00658
Petitioner:
Quantas Turner
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
Sheriff Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ragland v. Mason
as 3:2018cv00579
Plaintiff:
John David Ragland
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sorapuru et al v. Denka Performance Elastomer LLC et al
as 2:2018cv07936
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Denka Performance Elastomer LLC, DowDuPont, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eddrain Williams, Ricky P. Johnson, Joseph Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clayton v. Mason
as 3:2018cv00568
Petitioner:
Randolph Clayton
Respondent:
Victor Mason
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ragland v. City of Jackson et al.
as 3:2018cv00491
Petitioner:
John David Ragland
Respondent:
City of Jackson, Hinds County and Victor Mason
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Mason et al
as 3:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
Robert Harris
Defendant:
Victor Mason, Mary Rushing, Unknown Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Rushing et al
as 3:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee White, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Rushing and Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv01032
Plaintiff:
Shantell Johnson
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi , Hinds County Sheriff's Office , Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
