Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Adams v. Smith
as 18-873
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Adams, III
Defendant - Appellee: Nancy Smith, Nurse Administrator; Upstate Correctional Facility and Vijay Kumar Mandalaywala
Hawthorne v. Macelaru et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2017cv00438
Plaintiff: Rudolph Hawthorne
Defendant: Dragos Macelaru, Vijay Kumar Mandalaywala, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01565
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Kumar et al v. America's MHT Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00732
Plaintiff: Vijay Kumar and Donielle Green
Defendant: America's MHT Inc, Scott Postle, Ascentium Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00958
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Perfume Network Inc. v. DSP Trading Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06598
Defendant: DSP Trading Inc. and Vijay Kumar Tikyani
Plaintiff: Perfume Network Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Perfume Network Inc. v. DSP Trading Inc, et al
as 1:2015cv06598
Defendant: DSP Trading Inc, and Vijay Kumar Tikyani
Plaintiff: Perfume Network Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Corris v. Koenigsmann et al
as 9:2015cv01205
Plaintiff: Adam Corris
Defendant: Carl Koenigsmann , Robert Kasulke , Brian Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wala et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2014cv01151
Plaintiff: Johnathan Johnson
Defendant: Vijay-Kumar-Mandalay Wala , Donita McIntosh , Karen Bellamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vijay Goswami v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3537
Petitioner: VIJAY KUMAR GOSWAMI
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?