Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Beck v. Jennings et al
as 3:2026cv00025
Plaintiff:
Pamela A. Beck
Defendant:
Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings, Magistrate Regina S. Edwards and Clerk James J. Vilt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Smith v. Vilt et al
as 3:2025cv00209
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lovell Smith
Defendant:
James Vilt, Jr., Roy G. Ford, John and Janes Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Heath v. Boom et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan Heath
Defendant:
District Judge Claria H. Boom and James J. Vilt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Vilt v. Foris DAX, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Vilt
Defendant:
Foris DAX, Inc., Foris DAX, Inc. doing business as Crypto.com and XR Trading, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
WILLIAMSON v. LINDSEY et al
as 1:2022mc00127
Petitioner:
ANTONIO-DIONTE WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
COLIN LINDSEY, REBECCA GRADY JENNINGS, REGINA EDWARDS and others
Vilt Law, PC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2022cv04217
Plaintiff:
Vilt Law, PC
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Atkins v. Vilt
as 21-2313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES J. VILT, JR., DREW D'AGOSTINO, KIM FERGUSON and others
Rebekah Atkins v. James Vilt, Jr., et al
as 21-5544
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN SWINK, JOANN L. SPICER, EMILY BRAUN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Atkins v. Vilt et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Elizabeth Parks, April Dowell, Candace Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
