Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kareem Garrett v. Muhammad Naji, et al
as 26-3757
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services Inc, Shella A. Khatri, Vincent Defelice and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem A. Garrett
Kareem Garrett v. Muhammad Naji, et al
as 26-1584
Plaintiff:
KAREEM GARRETT
Defendant:
DEBRA YOUNKIN, Corrections Health Administrator Nurse, JANET PEARSON, Nurse Supervisor, SGT. JAMES and others
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. POBORSKY
as 3:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COII STEPHEN POBORSKY, CO1 BRADLEY MORGAN, JR., CO11 C.A. NEYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry Robinson v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 16-3893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURRY ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VINCENT DEFELICE, Unit Manager and others
Nicholas Pracht v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 16-3169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS ALBERT PRACHT
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KENNETH CAMERON, WUJUOLA and others
ROBINSON v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
CURRY ROBINSON
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMROM, JOHN E. WETZEL, VINCENT DEFELICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PRACHT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALBERT PRACHT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, KENNETH R. CAMERON, MR. MUBALAJ WUJUOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. CO JOHN DOE et al
as 3:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
CALVIN EDWARDS
Defendant:
CO JOHN DOE, VINCENT DEFELICE, LT. SHEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
