Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Sears v. McCoy et al
as 1:2017cv00869
Plaintiff:
Richard Sears
Defendant:
Donte McCoy, A. Peters, J. Eveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricciardi v. Schumencky et al
as 1:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Ricciardi
Defendant:
Schumencky, Woods, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Demetrius Bailey
as 17-1614
Petitioner:
In re: DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT V BARTH, JR.
Lane v. Wolf et al
as 1:2017cv00495
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Lane
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeff Reuscher, Jennifer Pawling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Emory v. Vincent Mooney, et al
as 17-1366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN D. EMORY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY, CAPTAIN MORRIS, BILGER and others
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Mark-Alonzo Williams
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Michael Klopotoski, Michael Mahally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Mooney et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Richard Sears
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, Trisha Kelley, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, MICHAEL MAHALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAMICHIELI v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2016cv06325
Petitioner:
LAMAR L. ZAMICHIELI
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRITCHETT v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2016cv01751
Petitioner:
DREW PRITCHETT
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY , ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
