Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robinson v. Hinninger et al
as 1:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
David Hinninger, All Board of Trustees/All Members, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stock v. Grundy County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Alexander Raymond Stock
Defendant:
Grundy County, Tennessee, Grundy County Sheriffs Department, Heath Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hinninger et al
as 3:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
David Hinninger, All Board of Trustees/All Members, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norrod v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Jared Alan Norrod
Defendant:
Core Civic, Vinnie Vantell, Korja Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norrod v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jared Alan Norrod
Defendant:
Core Civic, Vinnie Vantell, Korja Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Family Dollar Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
Vinnie L. Smith
Defendant:
Family Dollar Inc. and Dollar Tree Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Brent v. Vantell
as 1:2022cv01005
Petitioner:
John Brent
Respondent:
Vinnie Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammed v. Ponds et al
as 3:2020cv00602
Plaintiff:
Muhammed Muhammed
Defendant:
Elisabeta Lopez, Byron Ponds, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Higgs et al
as 3:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
Anton Tamir Mason
Defendant:
Ronald Higgs, Melvin Vinny and Tonya Warwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Test v. Test
as 2:2007cv09999
Plaintiff:
Vinnie Test
Defendant:
Vinnie Test
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
