Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Stuckey v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc.
as 2:2013cv12096
Plaintiff:
Toni Stuckey
Defendant:
VOITH INDUSTRIAL SERVICES INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. Voith Industrial Services Inc
as 4:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Amanda Smith
Defendant:
Voith Industrial Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gary Muffley v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc, et al
as 12-6628
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY W. MUFFLEY, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellee:
VOITH INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION NO. 862, AFL-CIO and UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Muffley v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00458
Petitioner:
Gary W. Muffley
Respondent:
Voith Industrial Services, Inc. , United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local Union No. 862, AFL-CIO and United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO
Amicu:
General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Korb v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
Bob Korb
Defendant:
Voith Industrial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brock v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Sol D. Brock
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Voith Industrial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
