Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Walls et al v. VRE Chicago Eleven, LLC
as 1:2020cv01522
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Walls and Terryll Ann Walls
Defendant:
VRE Chicago Eleven, LLC and Service List
In Re:
Subpoena Issued to First Internet Bank of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Lacey v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00711
Defendant:
VRE Alamosa, LLC and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kara M. Lacey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ching v. VRE Chicago Eleven, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Donna Y.T. Ching
Defendant:
VRE Chicago Eleven, LLC, Verdad Real Estate, Inc., EXP Realty Advisors, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walls v. VRE Chicago Eleven, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv04048
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Walls and Terryll Ann Walls
Defendant:
VRE Chicago Eleven, LLC, Verdad Real Estate, Inc., EXP Realty Advisors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Virtual Realty Enterprises, LLC et al v. County of San Luis Obispo
as 2:2016cv00759
Defendant:
County of San Luis Obispo
Plaintiff:
VRE Spanish Springs LLC and Virtual Realty Enterprises LLC
JMO Property, LLC v. VRE Chicago Eleven LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
JMO Property, LLC
Defendant:
VRE Chicago Eleven LLC, Verdad Real Estate, Inc., CBRE Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: James Gianulia
as 13-60044
Debtor:
In re: JAMES C. GIANULIAS
Appellant:
THOMAS SEAMAN, Trustee of the Creditors Trust for the Reorganized Debtors James C. Gianulias and Cameo Homes, a California corporation
Appellee:
VRE ACCEPTANCE, LLC and VIRTUAL REALTY ENTERPRISE, LLC
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. VRE HOLDING, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
VRE HOLDING, L.L.C. and VIRTUAL REALTY ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
