Cases 1 - 10 of 18
PHILLIPS v. JUDGE R. BARCLAY SURRICK
as 2:2023cv03343
Plaintiff:
GLENN W. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
JUDGE R. BARCLAY SURRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHILLIPS et al v. CHADDS FORD INVESTORS, L.P.
as 5:2014cv06546
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. PHILLIPS and FOSTER STANLEY SAFT, D.D.S
Defendant:
CHADDS FORD INVESTORS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9604
CHADDS FORD INVESTORS, L.P. v. PHILLIPS et al
as 5:2014cv06509
Plaintiff:
CHADDS FORD INVESTORS, L.P.
Defendant:
THOMAS W. PHILLIPS, FOSTER STANLEY SAFT, D.D.S and BRANDYWINE SUMMIT CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9604
CHASE v. JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE et al
as 3:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
WARREN CHASE
Defendant:
JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE, JUDGE DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MARYLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv45388
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PHILLIPS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2010cv56424
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PHILLIPS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53024
Plaintiff:
PATRICK W. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PHILLIPS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72202
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2010cv67158
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY W PHILLIPS and RUTH J PHILLIPS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC , BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC , CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33593
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
