Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Dillard v. Perry et al
as 5:2017ct03119
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Dillard, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Perry, W. David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Guice et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Brandon Chantel Little
Defendant:
W. David Guice, George T. Solomon, Michael Long and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayweather v. Guice et al
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Alfutir Kareem I-deen Mayweather
Defendant:
W. David Guice, George T. Solomon, FNU Auer and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
King et al v. Perry et al
as 5:2017ct03043
Plaintiff:
Timothy Royal King, Michael Blakney, Derick White and others
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, W. David Guice, Cynthia Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeill v. Solomon et al
as 5:2017ct03028
Plaintiff:
Demetris McNeill
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, Frank L. Perry, W. David Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03329
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Dillard, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Perry, W. David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Pickens v. Kieran Shanahan
as 16-7647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
KIERAN J. SHANAHAN, Secretary of the Department of Public Safety, W. DAVID GUICE, Chief Deputy Secretary of DPS, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Boger v. Guice et al
as 5:2016hc02289
Petitioner:
Derrick D. Boger
Respondent:
W. David Guice and George T. Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PICKENS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2016cv01358
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, W. DAVID GUICE, SCOTLAND COUNTY/MUNICIPALITY/LAURINBURG, NC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03290
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Perry
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, W. David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
