Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bakx et al
as 3:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sarah Bakx, W.M., Cristina Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lopez v. W.M. Dewey & Son, Inc.
as 4:2012cv03749
Defendant:
W.M. Dewey & Son, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Lopez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Motley and others similarly situated v. W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02447
Plaintiff:
Ira B. Motley and others similarly situated
Defendant:
W.M. Barr & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Koerner et al v. Copenhaver et al
as 1:2012cv01091
Plaintiff:
Joseph Koerner and Frank Zachman
Defendant:
John Copenhaver, Candice Rogers, Frederick Hardman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Alaska Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund et al v. W.M. Lewis Company
as 3:2010cv00253
Plaintiff:
Alaska Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund , Alaska Carpenters Defined Contribution Trust , Southern Alaska Carpenters Defined Benefit Trust and others
Defendant:
W.M. Lewis Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Southeast Laborers Health and Welfare Fund v. W.M. White, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00836
Plaintiff:
Southeast Laborers Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
W.M. White, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mendes v. W.M. Lyles Co.
as 1:2007cv01265
Plaintiff:
Frank Mendes
Defendant:
W.M. Lyles Co.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mendes v. W.M. Lyles Co.
as 1:2007at00439
Plaintiff:
Frank Mendes
Defendant:
W.M. Lyles Co.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Division 79 et al
as 2:2006cv00823
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Division 79, Edward L. Bright, United Transportation Union, Local 1376 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
