Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Shelby v. Petreucci
as 7:2023cv04315
Plaintiff:
July Justine Shelby
Defendant:
James Petrucci, Warden, Mr. W.S. Pliler, FCI Otisville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby v. Petreucci
as 4:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
July Justine Shelby
Defendant:
Warden J. Petreucci, James Petrucci, W.S. Pliler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Mathena, et al
as 7:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Rector, Tracy Mathena, Tim Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Anderson, et al
as 7:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
David Anderson, Tracy Mathena, Sgt. J. Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv09602
Petitioner:
Mario Gonzalez
Respondent:
W.S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hueston v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv07926
Petitioner:
Harry Hueston
Respondent:
Warden W.S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gage v. FCI Otisville Federal Correctional Institution et al
as 7:2022cv07810
Plaintiff:
Anwar L. Gage
Defendant:
FCI Otisville Federal Correctional Institution, Warden W.S. Plirer, Clemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv03817
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
Warden W.S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
