Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
USA v. Alan Johnson
as 18-50189
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Alan Johnson v. Darleen Drew, et al
as 17-11439
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DARLEEN DREW, Warden, USP-Atlanta and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, the State of Texas
Johnson et al v. Abb Vie, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04587
Plaintiff:
William Wade Johnson and Erin Ann Johnson
Defendant:
Abb Vie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 5:2017hc02121
Petitioner:
Alan Wade Johnson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Justin F. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moosman et al v. Wyoming All Breeds Racing Association - 2 Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ron Moosman , Laurie Moosman , Bryce Moosman and others
Defendant:
Wyoming All Breeds Racing Association - 2 Inc, Gerald Kaul, Ronald Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Johnson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016cv00246
Petitioner:
Alan Wade Johnson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TX 78216
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alan Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 16-10534
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DARLEEN DREW, Warden, USP-Atlanta and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, the State of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
