Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Davina Ricketts v. Wake County Public School System
as 22-1814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVINA RICKETTS
Defendant / Appellee:
WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, WCPSS, WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, KEITH SUTTON, current Board Member and others
Arkalgud Lakshminarasimha v. Duke Energy Progress
as 21-2249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARKALGUD N. LAKSHMINARASIMHA
Defendant / Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, GE, EPRI and others
Wake County Public School System v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv07979
Plaintiff:
Wake County Public School System
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Ricketts v. Wake County Public School System et al
as 5:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Kevin Hill, George Barilich, Monica Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Davina Ricketts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
William Davis, Jr. v. Town of Cary North Carolina
as 17-1511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA, HAROLD WEINBRECHT, Mayor, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Town of Cary North Carolina
as 16-2019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA, HAROLD WEINBRECHT, Mayor, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
