Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Walding v. Forrest Tire Company, Inc.
as 2:2026cv01496
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Walding
Defendant:
Forrest Tire Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mahic v. Wald et al
as 8:2026cv01272
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mahic
Defendant:
Alex Wald, Alexandra Spadaro, Paul Bolah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hark'n Technologies v. Orange Whip Fitness X, et al
as 26-4053
Plaintiff:
HARK'N TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
ORANGE WHIP FITNESS X, LLC, DOUGLAS J. WALD, BRIAN J. NEWMAN and others
Hark'n Technologies v. Orange Whip Fitness X, et al
as 26-4052
Plaintiff:
HARK'N TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
ORANGE WHIP FITNESS X, LLC, DOUGLAS J. WALD, BRIAN J. NEWMAN and others
Travis Edward Martin et al v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 2:2026cv03714
Plaintiff:
Travis Edward Martin
Defendant:
United States Small Business Adminstration, James Wald, Natalie Wald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Knobloch, Inc., et al v. Brian Walding
as 26-90011
Petitioner:
KNOBLOCH, INC., SERMA FUNDING, LLC and TANNEHILL SEWER, LLC
Respondent:
BRIAN R. WALDING
Walde v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 2:2026cv00076
Plaintiff:
Paul Walde
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Deborah Lee Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wald v. Kopp
as 1:2025cv10151
Petitioner:
evan wald
Respondent:
Marlyn Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
