Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PREACHER v. CORRECT CARE SERVICES
as 2:2019cv01207
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES, DR. KROSS, COUNSELOR MICHAEL STELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Quintez Talley v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-2074
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLY MANKEY, CASSIDY L. NEAL, TIMOTHY MAZZOCCA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01685
Defendant:
DR. LUCAS MALISHCHAK, JOHN BURT, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SPRUELL v. SHAWLEY et al
as 2:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN SPRUELL
Defendant:
TRACY SHAWLEY, MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MOATS, CO. I et al
as 2:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
MOATS, CO. I, A. SCHAMP, JOHN DOE (S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewayne Moore v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 16-3977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE MOORE, a/k/a JAMES BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, LORINDA WINFIELD, DSFM and others
REID-DOUGLAS et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REID-DOUGLAS, THOMAS SCOTT and DALIYL MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , JAMES BARNACLE , DAVID PITKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEARMAN v. NICKELOS et al
as 2:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL MOSES SPEARMAN
Defendant:
D. NICKELOS, WILSON, K. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01709
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FELINO, LORINDA WINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
