Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WALSINGHAM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14436
Plaintiff: ANDREW WALSINGHAM
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Logan v. J. Godwin, et al
as 22-14171
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee: J. A. GODWIN, T. DYKES, P. WHITE and others
WALSINGHAM v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv00251
Plaintiff: NOLAN BRIAN WALSINGHAM
Defendant: CENTIMARK CORPORATION and TAYLOR PRESTON PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
LOGAN v. GODWIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv09565
Plaintiff: JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant: GODWIN, T DYKES, P WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Circle v. Walsingham Group, Inc.
as 3:2021cv02428
Plaintiff: Jeff Circle
Defendant: Walsingham Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
WALSINGHAM v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv11667
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff: CHARLES WALSINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAHON v. BROWN ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00171
Plaintiff: Dusten A Mahon
Defendant: Debbie Walsingham, Kyle Contini, MD, Tara Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALSINGHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/7:20-CV-05628
Plaintiff: WALSINGHAM
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
WALSINGHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05628
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: JAMES WALSINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAEZ v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00601
Defendant: ALLENDER, MARK INCH, CHARLES WALSINGHAM and others
Plaintiff: JASON BAEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?