Cases 41 - 50 of 212
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Lionel Alford, et al v. Walton County
as 21-13999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIONEL ALFORD, co-Trustees of the Lionel D. Alford Jr. and Tammy Nix Alford Revocable Trust, TAMMY ALFORD, co-Trustees of the Lionel D. Alford Jr. and Tammy Nix Alford Revocable Trust, DOUGLAS B. BUSH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTON COUNTY, Political Subdivision of the State of Florida
HOOD v. WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 3:2021cv00127
Petitioner:
PAUL M HOOD
Respondent:
WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Walton County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv04556
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Hood
Defendant:
Walton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNCAN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00895
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EARL DUNCAN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
as 3:2021cv00507
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARKULIN v. WALTON COUNTY
as 3:2020cv06004
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY
Plaintiff:
DEREK MARKULIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Christopher Wheat v. Jeff Day
as 20-14142
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFF DAY, Walton County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER WHEAT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
