Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Keith Purdie v. Brian Gage
as 16-1139
Petitioner - Appellant:
Keith Dawne Purdie
Respondent - Appellee:
Brian Gage, Warden Department of Correctional Services NE State
Casey Ates v. Iris Arnold, et al
as 15-14372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASEY ATES
Defendant - Appellee:
IRIS ARNOLD, Parole Officer, Dublin, GA, KEY MCGUIRE, Police Chief, Cochran, GA, WARDEN, Department of Corrections and others
:
SERVICE
Charles Eato v. T. Royal, et al
as 14-12214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES J. EATO
Defendant - Appellee:
T. ROYAL, Warden, Department of Corrections, BAKER, Assistant Warden, Department of Corrections, T. SCHAMIT and others
Ledea v. Metro-Dade County Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv23117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillip Ledea
Defendant:
Metro-Dade County Police Department, Jorge Rodriguez, Alexis Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Warden Department of Correction City of New York (O.B.C.C.) et al
as 1:2012cv08995
Plaintiff:
Naphtali Campbell
Defendant:
Warden Department of Correction City of New York (O.B.C.C.) and Officers of the intake area for 6 days non house
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Treece v. P. Pitre, et al
as 11-30652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TREECE
Defendant - Appellee:
P. PITRE, Department of Corrections, TERRY TERRELL, Warden, Department of Corrections, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary, Department of Corrections and others
Robert Ruiz v. R. Jarvis, et al
as 08-56037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT RUIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
R. JARVIS, Industrial Supervisor, Prison Industry Authority (PIA), official and individual capacity, D. BAKER, Inmate Assignments for California State Prison - L.A. Co., official and individual capacity, M. HUNTER, individually and as Chief Deputy Warden, Department of Corrections and others
Devon Frye v. Warden
as 08-6173
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEVON A. FRYE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
